Where do you get your photos printed?
Posted: 06 June 2009 12:47 AM   [ Ignore ]
Administrator
Rank
Total Posts:  2
Joined  2009-04-29

I’ve been using Shutterfly for some time and I’ve always gotten good quality prints. They have a lot of specials, so oftentimes they’re a good deal to (12 or 15 cents a print), but I’ve never compared the quality to other services. What is your experience?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 13 June 2009 03:37 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Administrator
Avatar
Rank
Total Posts:  21
Joined  2009-04-29

Hi Anastasia,

It’s been a while since I personally tested these services, but I will put it on our to-do list. In the meantime, check out Top Ten Reviews’ article http://digital-photo-printing-review.toptenreviews.com Their top pick is Snapfish, which has also impressed me.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 01 July 2009 11:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  4
Joined  2009-07-01

I like to test all of the photo sites from time to time, because they are always evolving.  There are so many online sites to choose from, but I want the best quality so I gravitate to the photo-dedicated sites, like Shutterfly, Kodak Gallery, and Snapfish, which are focused on photo printing, and thus do it best. 

The short answer is that you can’t go wrong with any of these three.  The old adage “you get what you pay for” is also true.  They each have slightly different features, and like finding a glove that fits, you’ll find the photo site that fits you best. 

If I can generalize based on my experience, Shutterfly is a little more pricey, but it focuses on making the site very easy to use and delivering state-of-the-art print quality. Lately Shutterfly has been improving the “sharing” and community experience, with features like full-screen slide shows, support for video, and personalized pages. Shutterfly also does not currently have an “expiration date” for photos, which means it continues storing them whether or not you order prints.

Snapfish, owned by HP, excels at offering a wide variety of gift items, and often has lower cost prints. It has also added friendly features like a full-screen slide show, cell phone upload, and a robust “photo tips and ideas” section. Snapfish even accepts roll film.

Kodak Gallery falls between the two, in prices and features. 

Each of these sites have tools for making custom photo books and greeting cards online, and though each is slightly different, they all work fairly well and are easy enough to use. 

These sites print your photos on their huge equipment at a central location.  You are getting the best quality that they can produce on giant specialized equipment.  On the other hand, if you want same-day pickup at a local retail store, the quality can vary because your prints are made locally inside that retail store on its own equipment, which may not be as well maintained nor as robust.  Shutterfly’s retail partner for local pickup is Target, Kodak Gallery’s are Target and CVS, and Snapfish’s are Walgreens and Meijer.

I hope these ideas help.  There are many other aspects we could explore, such as photo sites that excel at online sharing rather than prints; other ways to produce photo books offline; paying for online storage.  My best advice for busy people is to find a favorite big-name site, one that is not likely to go out of business, and park your photo activity there.  If you’re an infrequent user, you’ll appreciate having all your photos in one place and becoming familiar with that site.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 06 July 2009 08:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  3
Joined  2009-07-06

I use Snapfish and have been very happy with the quality of prints, the products, customer service and price.  I appreciate that they even warn you when ordering if the quality of your picture isn’t good enough to get a good print.  In addition to mailing you prints, you can now pick them up at select retailers.  I haven’t used the retail service yet, but if I’m ever in a rush for my prints it’s nice to know I have this option. 

I have extensive albums with Snapfish and spend a lot of time captioning my photos.  The only thing I wish Snapfish would do is to take the time and date stamp of my photos during upload and incorporate them into the picture’s label and on the back of any prints as well as printing my captions on the back of my prints.  I keep suggesting this ... maybe someday.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 07 July 2009 12:08 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Newbie
Rank
Total Posts:  7
Joined  2009-06-10

Smugmug seems to have higher quality paper, more precise image processing and better constructed photo books than Shutterfly or Kodak.  I have not used Snapfish yet.

Profile
 
 
   
 
 

Join in on the discussion. Login if you're already a forum member, or register here.