Tech Made Simple

Hot Topics: How to Fix Bluetooth Problems | The Best Holiday Gifts | Best Fitness Trackers Under $50 | Complete Guide to Facebook Privacy

Top News Stories

author photo

5 Tech Products that Just Won't Die

by on June 22, 2011
in Music and Video, News, Cameras and Photography, Computers and Software, Health and Home, Blog :: 4 comments

A month ago, I wrote a story about which tech products will be dead in five years. Boy, was I surprised by the response! Who knew that people could be so passionate about DVD backups?

But it’s that passion for the status quo that keeps some technologies going long past the end of their useful lives. And there are other products that just won’t die because, no matter how inefficient or clunky they may be, nothing else has come along that’s better (or at least better at a reasonable price).

Five, in particular, should have gone the way of the dodo long ago, yet continue to hang on and, in some cases, even flourish.

VCRs

Maxell VHS tapesThose of us who grew up in the ‘70s have a soft spot in our hearts for VCRs. They brought us many advances that we now take for granted – movies in the home, time-shifted program watching, and clocks that permanently blink “12:00”. But those fragile VHS tapes provided a poor picture even when they were new and they don’t hold up well to time or repeated usage. And the VCR features have been replaced by far superior Blu-ray, DVRs and movie streaming products.

Yet, VHS keeps going thanks to existing home libraries of movies and wedding videos. Panasonic, Samsung and many other manufacturers are still making VHS players and VHS tapes are still widely available. Just remember those tapes won’t last forever. So copy your precious memories to another format before you lose them.

Film Cameras

Kodak filmIt’s amazing to think that with digital cameras available that can take thousands of 16MP resolution pictures without running out of space, film cameras would still be around. Yet film soldiers on with disposable cameras and artistic photography. There is still a case to be made that disposable film cameras are perfect for plopping on the table at weddings or other events for guests to take their own candid shots. Though I’ll put my money on an app coming out soon for smartphones that will serve the same function. But the budding lomography community proves there will be a place for film in art for quite some time.

Incandescent Bulbs

Broken incandescent bulbPerhaps the most inefficient technology in use today, incandescent bulbs only convert 10% of the energy they use into light, the rest is loss to heat. That’s great if you’re Hasbro making Easy-Bake Ovens, but not if your goal is to reduce global power consumption. Compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFL) are 3-5 times more efficient than incandescent bulbs and last 10 times as long. But CFL bulbs take a little longer to turn on and reach full brightness. Plus, their odd shape means they won’t fit into some light fixtures. And then there’s the issue of CFL bulbs containing mercury and requiring special disposal handling.

The result? CFL sales are actually falling, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. It looks like Easy-Bake ovens will be churning out cookies for some time to come.

Dial-Up Internet

Internet Junction dial-upAh yes, the nostalgic beeping and screeching of a dial-up connection being established still brings a tear to my eye. But I certainly would never return to the days of a 56Kbps modem when I can get online through my 30Mbps FiOS line, which is more than 500 times faster. Yet nearly 3% of American households – more than 3 million – are still using dial-up in 2011, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. The primary reasons for not switching in the Department of Commerce study were “Don’t need it” and “Too expensive,” with “Lack of availability” an important factor in rural areas.

So a file that takes me 10 seconds to download takes a dial-up user an hour and twenty minutes and they don’t think they need broadband? Yep, some habits die hard.

Rear Projection TVs

Mitsubishi WD-73640 DLP TVSuper-thin LCD and plasma TVs sent fat, heavy cathode ray tube TVs to the great tech store in the sky, but they haven’t been able to kill off rear projection TVs. Even though rear projection TVs are over a foot thick, suffer from poor viewing angles and have a bulb that requires replacing every few thousand hours, they still offer a value proposition that simply can’t be beat.

You can pick up a 65” Mitsubishi set offering 1080p, 3D and Internet apps for under $1,000 on Amazon. An equivalent 65” Panasonic plasma will cost you more than $2,300. And if you have the room, an 82” Mitsubishi rear projection set is under $2,000 – a plasma that size would cost more than my wedding.

 

[Broken light bulb via Shutterstock]



Discussion loading

gravatar

Technology is beginning to bypass

From richard on June 23, 2011 :: 11:38 am

Technology is beginning to bypass older laptops and netbooks.

Reply

gravatar

Not so surprising

From Mikw on June 23, 2011 :: 8:51 pm

Film cameras—

I shoot mostly digital,  but…

You can’t take an Ilford 400 ASA and push it to 1000 ASA in a digital camera.

I can duplicate the result in PhotoShop, maybe…

Film will always be with us. I was disappointed to see that the last place that processed Kodachrome closed recently. Although I was never one for using Kodachrome, now there is nowhere commercial to send it for processing.

Kodachrome is warm. The equivalent Fuji Film is just green…


Incandescent bulbs…

It’s thirty below zero. I turn on my porch light. CFL takes awhile to come on to full brightness and never quite makes it. Incandescent is on right away.

Have you ever cut yourself on a CFL that broke? And spread mercury all over the place?

Light from the CFLs is harsh, difficult to read by and they are expensive.

Reply

gravatar

I totally agree to this

From vhs tape to dvd on October 25, 2011 :: 10:43 am

I totally agree to this post. I got almost all these gadgets at home.

Reply

gravatar

Sentimental for old junk but sometimes you're stuck with it

From Wayne on October 28, 2011 :: 11:33 pm

Yes, I still have quite a few VHS, only because some rarer movies or series have yet to enter the Digital Realm of release. Though I’m not a major fan of John Wayne, not all of his films are on DVD and I kind of like the picture quality because sometimes they don’t properly clean-up the film for DVD transfer and your stuck seeing grainny, unsharp pictures.

Our home still has incandescent lighting due to the fact it’s an older home and can not support the new bulb technology w/out some electronical interference to devices such as radio and TV.

Film will still be around because unlike the grainess I don’t want my eyes to see in Movie film I actually artistically prefer it in my photographs…and not all software can imitate every little thing that shows up from using film. Would you want a computer to create random dots for your color photograph? No, and lets not forget those dots may appear in color and may not mesh well with the color of the scene(s)but B&W may have less of that problem. Even the most expensive commercial photo editor product can’t recreate film a 100%, I have found from experience that Adobe Photoshop CS2 can come close. That is just my opinion.

Dial-up a long distance connection…Apparently living in a rural area has a disadvantage for getting Broadband or DSL. Until they update for faster internet my options are: paying some extra expensive dollars to the phone company for a equipment hook up that will give me the “lowest” quality speed of hi-speed net or I could pay for satellite net that is also expensive in cost. Coincidently though neighbors two miles all around from us have Hi-speed internet. Is their a conspiracy going on? No, I just live to far from a phone station for hi-speed.

Reply

© 2015 Techlicious LLC. Home | About | Meet the Team | Sponsorship Opportunities | Newsletter Archive | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy

site design: Juxtaprose