Tech Made Simple

Hot Topics: How to Fix Bluetooth Pairing Problems | Complete Guide to Facebook Privacy | How to Block Spam Calls | Snapchat Symbol Meaning

author photo

The Best Slow Cooker

by Josh Kirschner on August 27, 2014
in Top Picks, Health and Home, Kitchen, Guides & Reviews
Rating: 4 Stars four stars

Techlicious editors independently review products. To help support our mission, we may earn affiliate commissions from links contained on this page.

The Crock-Pot 6.5 Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker (SCVT650-PS) delivered the best slow cooking results and, at $79, is a good deal, making it our pick for the best slow cooker.

Crock-Pot 6.5 Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker ($79)

Crock-Pot 6.5 Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker

Slow cookers, also known as Crock-Pots (actually a trademark for slow cookers made by the Jarden corporation), are one of the most convenient kitchen appliances. You don't need to touch them while they cook; just add the recipe ingredients, turn on the slow cooker and continue your day while your dish cooks. Slow cookers are equally useful cooking family meals while everyone is at work and school as they are making a delicious beef bourguignon for your party guests.

Unlike most other kitchen appliances, a slow cooker takes on the entire task of cooking while you're away from the kitchen, leaving little opportunity to adjust when things aren't going right. With that in mind, it's imperative to select a slow cooker you can trust to nail the basics.

We spent hours and hours testing five top-rated models to find out which is worthy of becoming your go-to appliance for creating delicious stews and perfectly braised meats. In the running were the Calphalon 7-Quart Digital Slow Cooker ($146 on Amazon), the Crock-Pot 6.5-Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker ($79 on Amazon), the Cuisinart 6-Quart 3-in-1 Cook Central Multi-Cooker ($159 on Amazon), the Hamilton Beach Set ‘n Forget 6-Quart Oval Programmable Slow Cooker ($50 on Amazon), and the KitchenAid 6-Quart Slow Cooker with Standard Lid ($100 on Amazon).

The winner: the Crock-Pot Countdown Touchscreen Digital Slow Cooker (SCVT650-PS). In our testing (and for other reviewers), the Crock-Pot consistently delivered the best slow cooking results. But it was a close call — and the Crock-Pot, like all the models we tested, certainly has its flaws.

Must-have features

There are two features we believe are must-haves in a slow cooker. First, the slow cooker must be large enough to prepare a meal for up to eight hungry people (ideally, with leftovers to spare), so we only looked at 6- to 7-quart models. Second, a slow cooker should have a programmable timer that can be set to cook until your recipe is done, then automatically shift to warming mode.

The Crock-Pot Countdown Touchscreen Digital Slow Cooker meets both these criteria with a 6.5-quart stoneware bowl and a timer that lets you program up to 20 hours of cooking time. Like the other models we tested, the Crock-Pot automatically switches to warm mode once cooking is complete.

Beyond those two top features, look for other features you may find useful, depending on your culinary needs.

Hamilton Beach Set ‘n Forget

Hamilton Beach Set ‘n Forget

The Hamilton Beach Set ‘n Forget has a lid that locks during transport, useful if you would like to take your slow cooker to a party. It also has a temperature probe when you want to cook a larger cut of meat to a final, specific temperature; however, since slow cooking is usually about bringing meat up to temperature and then cooking for long periods of time to render the fat and collagen, we consider the probe nice but not central to how most people use their slow cookers. In fact, we found almost no slow cooker recipes (including on Hamilton Beach's site) based on internal food temperature.

Cuisinart Cook Central Multi-Cooker

Cuisinart Cook Central Multi-Cooker

The Cuisinart Cook Central Multi-Cooker stands apart for its ability to sauté and brown ingredients. However, a big part of the appeal of slow cooking is the minimal prep work; slow cooker fans aren't usually eager for recipes that requiring you to brown ingredients. We don't consider a browning feature to be a significant advantage. And we also question the long-term reliability of the Cuisinart's nonstick coating (see below), so you might prefer to do this type of prep work in a pan on the stovetop.

Testy temperature ranges

By far the most important consideration for any slow cooker is how well it cooks—and there's some disagreement among reviewers whether any one model of slow cooker cooks better than another.

Consumer Reports has stopped rating slow cookers, finding that “Even small differences were overshadowed by what and how much was being cooked. What made one slow cooker better, or more convenient, than another was the features. Since we found little difference in overall cooking performance we no longer provide slow cooker ratings.”

However, the most common complaint among slow cooker owners is that their cookers cook at either too high or too low a temperature or that the temperature didn't rise quickly enough. Cook's Illustrated found significant differences among the slow cooker models in its testing: “Nine hours later, we variously uncovered dry, tough meat; meat that disintegrated; and juicy meat in rich, beefy sauce.” The reason for the differences, according to Cook's Illustrated, were variances in temperature—both the maximum temperature reached at each setting and how long it took the slow cooker to reach that temperature.

We undertook our own testing to find out which camp we fell into, combining a gigantic batch of ingredients for beef stew (the prototypical slow-cooker dish) and dividing it equally among our five test cookers. We set each on low and let them cook undisturbed for eight hours (as you might do when you head off to work in the morning, and around the average time of the slow cooker beef stew recipes we reviewed).

Techlicious test: beef stew

From left: Calphalon, Cuisinart, Crock-Pot, KitchenAid and Hamilton Beach

After eight hours, we tasted each of the stews, focusing on the flavor and texture of the meat. The results were telling: The Crock-Pot was the clear winner, producing the kind of moist, tender meat that slow cooking is all about. Cook's Illustrated arrived at the same result during its own testing, naming the Crock-Pot its top pick.

The Cuisinart was a step behind the Crock-Pot, producing beef chunks that were slightly dry but still pretty good. The Calphalon brought up third place with more dryness. The Hamilton Beach's beef chunks were dry and tough in comparison to the others, which may be due to the Hamilton Beach having the highest final cooking temperature of our test units at 209 degrees Fahrenheit.

KitchenAid 6-Quart Slow Cooker with Standard Lid

KitchenAid 6-Quart Slow Cooker with Standard Lid

Perhaps the biggest surprise was the KitchenAid, which hadn't managed to cook its meat anywhere close to done after eight hours. A temperature check showed it to be only 170 degrees Fahrenheit, well below the other cookers, which ranged from 195F to 209F. We upped the setting to medium for another two hours, but the temperature only rose to 174 degrees. We finally set it to high for two more hours, then left it in warm mode until the next morning. Only at that point did we finally achieve the luscious stew we were looking for.

A call to KitchenAid support informed us that the low setting should have cooked at between 194 degrees and 203 degrees Fahrenheit (90 to 95 degrees Centigrade). So we're not sure if we received a defective heating unit or the ill-fitting lid allowed too much heat to escape (the 1/4 inch gaps between the lid and ceramic bowl were significantly larger than the others cookers).

In fairness to KitchenAid, the other models we tested had all received consumer complaints about temperatures being too low, though we didn't find that in our testing. Though it's impossible for us to verify these individual cases, it appears that quality control may not be what it once was in the slow cooker industry.

For kicks, we also tested the probe feature of the Hamilton Beach in a whole-chicken cook-off against the Crock-Pot. We set the Hamilton Beach to stop cooking when the chicken reached 165 degrees Fahrenheit and set the Crock-Pot to cook for seven hours on low (based on multiple slow cooker chicken recipes we found). The Hamilton Beach brought the chicken to temperature in about three and half hours, much faster than expected, so we kept it on warm mode until the Crock-Pot finished. Surprisingly, the temperature of the Hamilton Beach chicken continued to rise significantly. After three hours on warm mode, the internal temperature of the chicken had reached 188 degrees Fahrenheit. So if you're using the probe, you'll also want to be around when your meat finishes cooking—this is NOT a set-and-forget cooking method.

Final results of the chicken cook-off were mixed. Most people preferred the breast meat from the slightly less-cooked Hamilton Beach bird, but the group was split on the dark meat.

Ergonomic and design challenges

Crock-Pot handle

Crock-Pot handle's tiny silicone coverings
do little to protect your hands.

For a product that's been around since the 1970s, you would think slow cooker manufacturers would have design and ergonomics nailed down by now. They're not. While the unit was cooking, the handles and outside of the Crock-Pot became burning hot, the tiny silicone coverings doing little to protect your hands. The Calphalon suffered the same handle flaw, although not to the same degree. The other units all got quite hot on the outside, with only the Cuisinart staying cool during cooking, although the Hamilton Beach's plastic handles stayed cool even when the rest of its outside was sizzling.

Controls on all five slow cookers were easy to set. Each cooker offers high and low settings and automatically goes into warm mode once cooking is done. The KitchenAid is the only model with a medium setting, but we don't see any added benefit. The Cuisinart also lets you set a temperature up to 400 degrees Fahrenheit for browning or sautéing.

The displays on all the models were easy to read with the exception of the Hamilton Beach, which was extremely dim and difficult to read in normal kitchen lighting.

Easy clean-up

The Crock-Pot Countdown Slow Cooker uses a removable ceramic cooking bowl that is easy to clean and dishwasher safe, as do the Calphalon, Hamilton Beach and KitchenAid models. Based on user reports for all brands of cracking bowls, we would recommend avoiding the risk of putting cooking bowls in the dishwasher.

The Cuisinart stands out as the only model with a nonstick aluminum (rather than ceramic) cooking pot. We were impressed by how easy the pot was to clean but question how well the nonstick coating will hold up over time. In our experience, all nonstick coatings eventually fail, and reviews on Amazon for the Cuisinart indicate this is an issue for some consumers.

Consistent owner ratings

For the most part, owners have been happy with each of the slow cookers in our test. Cuisinart leads the pack, garnering 4.5 out of 5 stars among Amazon reviewers. Hamilton Beach and Calphalon come in with similar results, 4.4 out of 5 stars, and the Crock-Pot and KitchenAid finish slightly behind with 4.1 out of 5 stars. The primary complaints for all models include cracked ceramic inserts (or a damaged nonstick surface for the Cuisinart) and the occasional unit found dead on arrival or dead after a few uses.

Unfortunately, the Crock-Pot is the only model we tested that doesn't offer a replacement insert or lid; they've been "out of stock" for months. If you break a lid or insert, you'll need to buy an entirely new Crock-Pot. Given the Crock-Pot's relatively low $79 price, that's not the end of the world, but it doesn't give us a warm and fuzzy feeling for Crock-Pot's customer service. Other manufacturers offer insert replacements from about $25 to $45.

Our Top Pick: Crock-Pot 6.5 Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker

At the end of the day, we wanted a slow cooker that first and foremost could reliably slow cook. In our tests, the Crock-Pot 6.5 Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker met that challenge (as it did for Cook's Illustrated's tests, as well). The Crock-Pot also is the second cheapest slow cooker in our test at $79, making it a pretty good deal, too.

There are things we're not crazy about with the Crock-Pot, such as its hot handles and lack of replacement parts, but external heating was a flaw among most of the slow cookers, and the Crock-Pot's low price somewhat counterbalances its disposable nature if you break the insert.

While it's not a perfect product, if you're in the market for a slow cooker, the Crock-Pot 6.5 Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker is a solid choice.

The runner-ups

The Calphalon 7-Quart Digital Slow Cooker finished in the middle of the pack in our slow cooker test, without any unique features that might justify its $150 price.

The Cuisinart 6-Quart 3-in-1 Cook Central Multi-Cooker cooked almost as well as the Crock-Pot. It allows you to saute or brown right in the slow cooker—a useful feature but one that could be easily reproduced on the stovetop without risking damage to its nonstick coating. At $159, we just don't think the feature is worth the premium.

The Hamilton Beach Set ‘n Forget 6-Quart Oval Programmable Slow Cooker didn't do well in our slow cooking test, but it does offer extra features such as a temperature probe and locking lid that some buyers may find useful. Its dim display was a real pain to read, however, bothering us every time we used it. At $49, this slow cooker runs $30 less than the Crock-Pot—nice for those on a tight budget.

The KitchenAid 6-Quart Slow Cooker failed to perform properly in our slow cooking test. It's possible we received a bad unit, but unfortunately we did not have time to get a new unit and set up a complete retest. And it's $20 more than the Crock-Pot, without any additional features to offer.

We also considered the All-Clad Polished Stainless Steel 6.5-Quart Slow Cooker (model 99009), which came in second place in Cook's Illustrated's testing. Terrible reliability reviews from owners (only 2.8 out of 5 stars on Amazon) and a high price ($151) excluded this one from the running.

Discussion loading

Thanks for a great review,

From Lisa Green on October 03, 2014 :: 11:26 pm

Thanks for a great review, I’ve been considering replacing my old one for a while now.


You're welcome!

From Josh Kirschner on October 04, 2014 :: 10:15 am

Let me know if you have any questions!


Crock Pot

From Nicole Christie on December 16, 2014 :: 2:18 pm

Great review! Really helpful—it’s so hard to sift through all of the models out there. I have seen in other reviews that there were comments about this model—the Crock Pot(SCVT650-PS)6.5 Qt. model 1)“boiling” things, 2)about the lid being ill-fitting, 3)and about the unit getting super hot on the outside to the point where people burn themselves. Did you happen to experience any of these tendencies?



From Josh Kirschner on December 16, 2014 :: 2:36 pm

Here’s what i found in my testing:

1. None of the slow cookers actually reached boiling temperatures on low (though the Hamilton Beach was pretty close at 209 degrees). However, most cooked at a “very fast simmer”, hotter than I would have liked. The exception was the Kitchen Aid, which cooked too slowly (unless you’re going for a 24-hour braise). Your food starting temperature will also heavily impact your results. Food started at a very high temperature may reach boiling, while food started a low temperature will take far longer to come up to temp.
2. I’ve seen complaints about ill-fitting lids for many on the models I tested. All of my lids fit fine, except for the Kitchen Aid. I suspect manufacturing variability may be common among most/all of the manufacturers.
3. Yes, the Crock Pot gets super hot on the outside. All the slow cookers did, except the Cuisinart


Crock Pot

From Nicole Christie on December 16, 2014 :: 3:35 pm

Thanks so much for the quick response Josh!


Crock-Pot capacity not as advertised

From Naomi on December 31, 2014 :: 3:46 pm

Did you notice that the Crock-Pot 6.5 Quart Countdown Programmable Touchscreen Slow Cooker does not actually hold 6.5 quarts?  I recently bought one to replace a 6.5 quart All-Clad (which I love but the crock cracked and I can’t get a replacement).  I thought the Crock-Pot looked smaller than the All-Clad so I measured both.  The Crock-Pot held half a quart less than the All-Clad, though both claimed to hold 6.5 quarts.  I was really disappointed and felt Crock-Pot advertised falsely.


All Clad comments

From Paul on January 02, 2015 :: 10:06 am

We shopped for an All Clad 6.6 qt. slow cooker recently and found most lids wobbled on the ceramic bowl, leaving an unacceptable gap. The lids were true, it is the bowl that is manufactured unevenly. The one bowl we found that did fit had several interior spots where the glaze did not cover the base material, which would expose the food to potentially toxic material and/or create further glazing failure.

Also, I am curious why the product warranties are not compared here?


Here's the warranty info

From Josh Kirschner on January 02, 2015 :: 4:05 pm

There was no particular reason why I didn’t compare warranties, other than I don’t believe it is one of the most important features in a slow cooker since most electronic failures happen shortly after purchase or else after warranty period has expired.

However, there are differences in the warranties offered:
Calphalon - 1 yr
Crock Pot - 3yr
Cuisinart - 3yr
Hamilton Beach - 1yr
Kitchen Aid - 1 yr (but with free replacement and return shipping, which is a nice bonus)


Warranties and Crock Pots

From Paul on January 03, 2015 :: 2:14 pm

Thanks for the warranty information Josh.
We get concerned about the life of ceramic inserts, for which it is not uncommon to read reviews of cracks, etc. These may occur within warranty, but are reported just out of warranty too.

For the slow cooker evaluations, it would also be very useful to determine whether lead is leached into the food during cooking.
For example, there is a review on Amazon of a Crock Pot brand 7 quart slow cooker that reportedly leachs lead into food above certain tempuratures. See the review at the link below -

Thank you again!


Cracks are a valid concern

From Josh Kirschner on January 05, 2015 :: 12:59 am

Yes, I have seen complaints of cracks among all the brands. Frequent issues were one of the reasons we excluded All Clad from our testing. The exception, of course, if Cuisinart with its non-stick insert; though that has issues with peeling over time. Whether or not a manufacturer will replace a cracked insert under warranty is another matter. I suspect most will not.

I was definitely disappointed that Crock Pot doesn’t offer a replacement insert for this model (as I mentioned in the article). On the other hand, with the cost of inserts and shipping approaching the price of the slow cookers, it wasn’t a deal killer for me.

I’m not sure how much stock to put in one review claiming high lead leaching, especially without knowing anything about who that person is or the proper method for testing lead in cookware. Also, I wouldn’t be surprised to find variation between models and even within model lines, depending on who manufactured the part. I’ll have to leave it up to the FDA to do that monitoring.

hamilton beach

From Johnny on February 02, 2015 :: 12:12 pm

i love the set and forget, and the meat probe is one of my favorite “extra’s” not often found in a slow cooker.


It's fine, if that's what you need

From Josh Kirschner on February 02, 2015 :: 1:34 pm

The meat probe on the Hamilton Beach is a unique feature, but I found it’s use to be limited. If you’re using a slow cooker to make roasts, then maybe. Otherwise, doesn’t serve much purpose. And you have to be on hand to take your meat out when it reaches tempo or it will overcook.


Slow cooker question

From Dona on March 10, 2015 :: 1:23 pm

Are there any slow cookers out there that are cool to the touch. Mine is hot and I don’t feel comfortable leaving the house when I use it. I would buy a new one if there was one that stayed cool on the outside. Thanks


Most are hot

From Josh Kirschner on March 10, 2015 :: 2:16 pm

Of the models I tested, all got very hot on the outside except the Cuisinart, which stayed relatively cool.


West Bend?

From Cheryl on October 21, 2015 :: 3:40 pm

First, thank you for the article. It’s been a bear trying to find a new slow cooker.

With all the issues of cracking, out of curiosity, have you tried or reviewed a West Bend (the metal - aluminum? ones)? I ask because that’s what I have. It is Teflon coated though, which I know many people don’t like. But the fact that it can go on the stovetop or in the oven, is dishwasher safe, is lightweight, and has 5 heat settings are reasons I love it.

I’m also wondering what your general thoughts are on West Bend slow cookers.


We didn't test a West Bend model

From Josh Kirschner on October 23, 2015 :: 1:13 pm

I didn’t test a West Bend model, so can’t provide direct feedback. However, the Cuisinart model we tested also has a metal bowl. Some users report peeling of the Teflon for both West Bend and Cuisinart, so this would be a concern of mine. And while a stoneware bowl could last forever (as long as it doesn’t crack), at some point you have to assume that the Teflon on the metal bowls will wear out. But I agree that the convenience of using on stovetop offers some benefit (though I have other pots in my kitchen that serve that purpose better).

Based on Amazon reviews, West Bend also seems to share the issue of cooking foods at too high a temperature that many of our tested models showed - leading to overcooked, dried out dishes.

All that being said, if your West Bend slow cooker is working for you, be happy. There is no perfect slow cooker and everyone has slightly different needs and weighs the features accordingly. And the West Bend is far cheaper than the comparable Cuisinart.


Thank you for your reply.

From Cheryl on October 23, 2015 :: 8:27 pm

Thank you for your reply. I appreciate the feedback. I need to replace mine because it’s not big enough (4qt) for my family. I wasn’t sure about the other types as I have many recipes where I can toss in frozen meat and start cooking (I was advised not to do this with the crockery types as it will crack). Sounds like I’m going to have to weigh what is most convenient for me. Right now, larger pot size and programmable are highest on my list. Again, thank you!


stoneware--non-stick coating

From dpint7 on April 23, 2016 :: 11:51 pm says there is a non-stick coating on their stoneware inserts, but don’t say what this coating is, and I can’t find the answer as far as I have searched. I have emailed this question to Crockpot but have not as yet received an answer. Doe anyone know the answer?


I believe that is only for certain models

From Josh Kirschner on April 24, 2016 :: 11:50 pm

I’m pretty sure the non-stick coating is only for models where the insert is stovetop safe. Crockpot calls it “DuraCeramic”, but provides little information about what it actually is. Slow cookers models that are not stovetop safe (such as the one in my review above) do not have a non-stick coasting.


best low cooker made in USA

From eve on April 30, 2016 :: 1:54 pm

Can you please tell what is the best low cooker made in the USA.
I do not want product sent to make in China
Thank you


Likely all made in China.

From Josh Kirschner on May 02, 2016 :: 11:18 am

We don’t track country of manufacture unless there is some specific reason why it matters for a product category. However, I would assume that all of the slow cookers are made in China or else assembled elsewhere of Chinese made parts.


A slow cooker without gas or electricity

From Cuong on May 09, 2016 :: 10:08 pm

Great reviews but I wish you had included the Wonderbag. A slow cooker without gas or electricity. Totally transportable, use it for camping and festivals. Have a look.


Interesting concept

From Josh Kirschner on May 11, 2016 :: 9:49 am

Wasn’t familiar with the Wonderbag. Interesting concept, though seems like a pretty specialized product. Wouldn’t be something most people would use as their regular slow cooker, as your ability to control time or temperature is pretty limited. Also would require you to use a spill proof pot if you are transporting unless you want to risk a big spill and/or massive burns.  But for those who want to check it out, here’s the link


Kitchenaid big thumbs down

From Rebekah on December 13, 2016 :: 10:18 pm

We have been persisting with our kitchenaid slow cooker for about 3 months but I’m ready to throw it out the window. A truly sub-par product from Kitchenaid. All we seem to do with it is destroy meat in large quantities.



From Josh Kirschner on December 13, 2016 :: 11:06 pm

What is the issue you’re having with your KitchenAid? Perhaps there is something that can be done to help overcome it.


Usefulness of a temperature probe?

From Barney on May 16, 2017 :: 7:06 pm

Hi - I’m really just starting my research on crock pots: what features to shop by, recipes, dos&donts;, finding what works best and what It’s best For.  I have the Crock Pot 4/6Q/split stoneware set.  Just cooked my first potful of chicken - vegetable curry.  Coming from the gas grill & smoker world, internal temperature (especially for poultry) is really important - both so that the meat is safe, and so it remains juicy and not overcooked.  So I’m curious about why you don’t seem to approve.  For example, why not stop your test when the probe registered 165 def F?  I think that would be a good way of finding whether that route is fruitful.  But you left the cooker on warm, and guess what - it got warmer.  So, why does it seem you are so set against using a probe?  Thanks - Barney


Crock Pots that Leach Lead

From Camille Nixon on January 31, 2018 :: 12:56 am

Please Tell Which Crock Pot inserts Do Not Leach Any Lead Ever. I wish that the United States would get into manufacturing crockpots that do not overheat on the outside or leach lead from the crockpot inserts. Thank you. Camille Nixon


New ones should be safe or go stainless

From Josh Kirschner on January 31, 2018 :: 11:41 am

Lead in glazes was largely an issue with older pottery. New slow cookers shouldn’t have this issue. According to Crock Pot customer support, “Newell Brands continues to proactively test its products for lead and other toxic metals, with the results continuing to come back favorably. Lead is not an additive in the Crock Pot® slow cooker ceramic glaze. Newell is diligent in its efforts to ensure that its products are compliant with applicable regulations regarding the presence of lead.”

If that doesn’t convince you, you can avoid the question entirely by buying a slow cooker with a stainless steel insert, such as the Instapot or a similar model from Crock-Pot or others - see:


Love getting helpful tech tips? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Home | About | Meet the Team | Contact Us
Media Kit | Newsletter Sponsorships
Accessibility Statement
Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookie Policy

Techlicious participates in affiliate programs, including the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, which provide a small commission from some, but not all, of the "click-thru to buy" links contained in our articles. These click-thru links are determined after the article has been written, based on price and product availability — the commissions do not impact our choice of recommended product, nor the price you pay. When you use these links, you help support our ongoing editorial mission to provide you with the best product recommendations.

© Techlicious LLC.