Tech Made Simple

Hot Topics: How to Fix Bluetooth Pairing Problems | Complete Guide to Facebook Privacy | How to Block Spam Calls | Snapchat Symbol Meaning

author photo

Can Big Data Take a Bite Out of Local Crime?

by on October 16, 2013
in Privacy, News, Computers and Software, Phones and Mobile, Blog :: 0 comments

Techlicious editors independently review products. To help support our mission, we may earn affiliate commissions from links contained on this page.

Data PrivacyToday, it seems like eyes are everywhere. The government is monitoring your email inbox (and pretty much everywhere else on the internet, too). Private companies are tracking your vehicle’s location and selling the information to the highest bidders. And, of course, law enforcement now has the legal right to track your physical location via your cell phone without any warrant required.

But the city of Oakland, California is taking government surveillance to a new level. Over the last couple years, the city has been installing a network of gunshot sound detectors, video surveillance cameras, traffic cameras, thermal cameras, radiation detectors and license plate readers to help fight against crime and terrorism. Now, through a $7 million grant from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Oakland is in the process of launching the Domain Awareness Center (DAC), a facility that will analyze data from these sources in real time, funneling information back to the cops.

A New York Times report on the DAC explains how the network of 1,000+ sensors and cameras works to solve crimes. “For example, if two men were caught on camera at the port stealing goods and driving off in a black Honda sedan, Oakland authorities could look up where in the city the car had been in the last several weeks. That could include stoplights it drove past each morning and whether it regularly went to see Oakland A’s baseball games.”

Naturally, there are major privacy concerns about the new initiative, since no court warrant is required to collect or analyze the data. The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California opposes Oakland’s effort, calling it a violation of constitutional privacy rights. Specifically, an ACLU blog entry criticizes DAC for “indefinitely retain(ing) video and other data, and allow(ing) it to be shared.”

Of course, the DAC only tracks crimes and activity in Oakland, but it’s just one of many similar efforts being launched by cities around the country. Indeed, with modern advances in facial recognition technology and data analysis, getting away with a crime may very well become downright impossible. Unfortunately, that means doing anything without the government knowing about it might become impossible too – if that isn’t already the case.

Discussion loading

Love getting helpful tech tips? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Home | About | Meet the Team | Contact Us
Media Kit | Newsletter Sponsorships
Accessibility Statement
Terms of Use | Privacy & Cookie Policy

Techlicious participates in affiliate programs, including the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, which provide a small commission from some, but not all, of the "click-thru to buy" links contained in our articles. These click-thru links are determined after the article has been written, based on price and product availability — the commissions do not impact our choice of recommended product, nor the price you pay. When you use these links, you help support our ongoing editorial mission to provide you with the best product recommendations.

© Techlicious LLC.